United States v. Coles

Third Circuit

United States v. Coles

374 F.2d 1003

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 11, 1967·No. Nos. 15843, 15889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal of two defendants from their conviction of bank robbery raises two points, one concerning allegedly prejudicial evidence and the other concerning the court’s charge on credibility. We have examined the record with care and find no error in the court’s handling of either of these matters. There was not even an objection to the charge on credibility.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal of two defendants from their conviction of bank robbery raises two points, one concerning allegedly prejudicial evidence and the other concerning the court’s charge on credibility. We have examined the record with care and find no error in the court’s handling of either of these matters. There was not even an objection to the charge on credibility.

The judgment will be affirmed.

United States v. Coles, 374 F.2d 1003 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

374 F.2d 1003 (United States v. Coles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related