United States v. Coles

Third Circuit

United States v. Coles

374 F.2d 1003

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1967

DocketNos. 15843, 15889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 F.2d 1003 (United States v. Coles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Coles, 374 F.2d 1003 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal of two defendants from their conviction of bank robbery raises two points, one concerning allegedly prejudicial evidence and the other concerning the court’s charge on credibility. We have examined the record with care and find no error in the court’s handling of either of these matters. There was not even an objection to the charge on credibility.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal of two defendants from their conviction of bank robbery raises two points, one concerning allegedly prejudicial evidence and the other concerning the court’s charge on credibility. We have examined the record with care and find no error in the court’s handling of either of these matters. There was not even an objection to the charge on credibility.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 F.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coles-ca3-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack