United States v. Coleman

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Coleman

453 F.2d 1374

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 1972

DocketNo. 71-2779

StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1374 (United States v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Coleman, 453 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

At issue is the failure to exhaust an administrative remedy: that is the taking of an appeal on the classification.

The tests of Lockhart [Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1969)] require affirmance. We cannot find this case within the exception of Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

At issue is the failure to exhaust an administrative remedy: that is the taking of an appeal on the classification.

The tests of Lockhart [Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1969)] require affirmance. We cannot find this case within the exception of Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1962).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 F.2d 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coleman-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack