United States v. Coleman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8516
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN LINCOLN COLEMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-1, CA-95-296-3-P)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 31, 1996
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Lincoln Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Coleman, Nos. CR-93-1; CA- 95-296-3-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Coleman (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.