United States v. Coleman

Third Circuit

United States v. Coleman

37 F. App'x 583

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 18, 2002

DocketNo. 01-4067

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F. App'x 583 (United States v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Coleman, 37 F. App'x 583 (3d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Carl Coleman appeals his conviction for illegal possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(j)(l). His only claim of error is his assertion that that state is an unconstitutional violation of the limits placed upon Congress under the Commerce Clause. We have, however, previously rejected this argument and upheld the validity of 922(j)(l). See, U.S. v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir.2001). Accordingly, we will reject appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of that statute and affirm his conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Carl Coleman appeals his conviction for illegal possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(j)(l). His only claim of error is his assertion that that state is an unconstitutional violation of the limits placed upon Congress under the Commerce Clause. We have, however, previously rejected this argument and upheld the validity of 922(j)(l). See, U.S. v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir.2001). Accordingly, we will reject appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of that statute and affirm his conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coleman-ca3-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack