United States v. Cole

187 F. App'x 378
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 444 F.3d 688
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. 05-10823·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Gary Anthony Cole, federal prisoner #22707-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for an evidentiary hearing and sentencing modification. In his motion, Cole challenged his 1992 convictions and sentences for conspiring to *379 obstruct, delay, and affect commerce by robbery; obstructing, delaying, and affecting commerce by robbery; and carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. Cole complains that the district court failed to address the merits of his arguments.

Regardless of the label Cole affixed to his motion, it challenged the constitutionality of his convictions and sentences and should have been construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir.2000). Cole had filed a previous § 2255 motion and did not obtain this court’s authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255. Thus, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Cole’s motion as a § 2255 motion. See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir.2000). We affirm the district court’s denial of Cole’s motion on that basis. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994).

Cole is warned that any further repetitious or frivolous filings, including those attempting to circumvent statutory restrictions on filing second or successive § 2255 motions, will result in the imposition of sanctions against him. These sanctions may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cole, 187 F. App'x 378 (5th Cir. 2006).

187 F. App'x 378 (United States v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Key
205 F.3d 773 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Tolliver v. Dobre
211 F.3d 876 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Darrell Early
27 F.3d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)