United States v. Cohen

Customs and Patent Appeals

United States v. Cohen

11 Ct. Cust. 488, 1923 WL 23865, 1923 CCPA LEXIS 25

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided May 7, 1923·No. No. 2187·Published

Opinion

Smith, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal raises the same question as that involved in the United States v. Henle Wax Paper Manufacturing Co., suit No. 2183, this day decided.

The importation is similar in quality, texture, and appearance to gelatin in sheets, and it is dutiable by similitude to manufactures of gelatin at 25 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 34 of the tariff act of 1913.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal raises the same question as that involved in the United States v. Henle Wax Paper Manufacturing Co., suit No. 2183, this day decided.

The importation is similar in quality, texture, and appearance to gelatin in sheets, and it is dutiable by similitude to manufactures of gelatin at 25 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 34 of the tariff act of 1913.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

United States v. Cohen, 11 Ct. Cust. 488, 1923 WL 23865, 1923 CCPA LEXIS 25 (ccpa 1923).

Pincite

11 Ct. Cust. 488 (United States v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.