United States v. Cohen

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cohen

115 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. No. 04-7587·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Milton Bachman Cohen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence under former Fed. R.Crim.P. 35. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Milton Bachman Cohen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence under former Fed. R.Crim.P. 35. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Cohen, 115 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

115 F. App'x 159 (United States v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.