United States v. Cofield

229 F. App'x 275
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2007·No. 06-7731·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keenan Kester Cofield appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his motion to reconsider, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), the denial of his “motion to correct sentence.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cofield’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cofield, 229 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2007).

229 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Cofield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.