United States v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District, Stephen Brown v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District, Stephen Brown v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District

520 F.2d 1405

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 10, 1975

Docket74-1160

StatusPublished

This text of 520 F.2d 1405 (United States v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District, Stephen Brown v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District, Stephen Brown v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District, 520 F.2d 1405 (5th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

The Court notes, however, that the Petition for Rehearing raises what may be serious questions, not mentioned in our opinion, with reference to attorney fees and back pay. Those contentions need not be repeated here, for they will be available to the District Court. Upon remand, the District Court will consider those contentions in the light of the facts and the law as it presently exists. In the exercise of its sound discretion, it will decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

The Court notes, however, that the Petition for Rehearing raises what may be serious questions, not mentioned in our opinion, with reference to attorney fees and back pay. Those contentions need not be repeated here, for they will be available to the District Court. Upon remand, the District Court will consider those contentions in the light of the facts and the law as it presently exists. In the exercise of its sound discretion, it will decree accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 F.2d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coffeeville-consolidated-school-district-stephen-brown-v-ca5-1975.