United States v. Cody Donald Fitzwater

94 F.3d 649, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37260, 1996 WL 443043
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 6, 1996
Docket96-1948
StatusUnpublished

This text of 94 F.3d 649 (United States v. Cody Donald Fitzwater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cody Donald Fitzwater, 94 F.3d 649, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37260, 1996 WL 443043 (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

94 F.3d 649

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Cody Donald FITZWATER, Appellant.

No. 96-1948.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1996.
Filed: August 6, 1996.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Cody Fitzwater pleaded guilty to knowingly and intentionally manufacturing marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). At sentencing, the district court1 denied Fitzwater's motion for a downward departure under U.S.S.G. §§ 5K2.0 or 5K2.11, p.s., and sentenced him to five months imprisonment followed by two years supervised release, the first five months of which are to be served in home confinement. Fitzwater appeals.

The district court's statements at sentencing clearly indicate that it did not find departure warranted by the facts of this case. Thus, its refusal to depart was an unreviewable exercise of discretion. See United States v. Rawe, 21 F.3d 850, 852 (8th Cir.1994) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sonya Tillery Rawe
21 F.3d 850 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 F.3d 649, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37260, 1996 WL 443043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cody-donald-fitzwater-ca8-1996.