United States v. Cobey Webb

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cobey Webb. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 F.4th 495
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2018·No. 17-7303·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7303

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

COBEY DARON WEBB,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:05-cr-00102-GEC-RSB-1)

Submitted: September 20, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cobey Daron Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cobey Daron Webb appeals the district court’s grant of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36

motion to amend his criminal judgment to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

United States v. Webb, No. 7:05-cr-00102-GEC-RSB-1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2018). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cobey Webb, (4th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Cobey Webb (United States v. Cobey Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.