United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr.

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr.

409 F.2d 846, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12418

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1969

Docket13133_1

StatusPublished

This text of 409 F.2d 846 (United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr., 409 F.2d 846, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12418 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

409 F.2d 846

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Cloyd Samuel RICHARDSON, Jr., Appellant.

No. 13133.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1969.

Decided May 13, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte; Wilson Warlick, Judge.

Lloyd F. Baucom, Charlotte, N. C., (Court-appointed counsel) [Haynes, Graham & Baucom on brief], for appellant.

Joseph Cruciani, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After considering the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI