United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr.

409 F.2d 846, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12418
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 13, 1969·No. 13133_1·Published

Opinion

409 F.2d 846

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Cloyd Samuel RICHARDSON, Jr., Appellant.

No. 13133.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1969.

Decided May 13, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte; Wilson Warlick, Judge.

Lloyd F. Baucom, Charlotte, N. C., (Court-appointed counsel) [Haynes, Graham & Baucom on brief], for appellant.

Joseph Cruciani, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After considering the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr., 409 F.2d 846, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12418 (4th Cir. 1969).

409 F.2d 846 (United States v. Cloyd Samuel Richardson, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.