United States V. Clinton Wade Dunson
This text of 345 F. App'x 956 (United States V. Clinton Wade Dunson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). We retain jurisdiction of the appeal and remand for the limited purpose of having the district court conduct an evidentiary hearing and whatever other proceedings it deems appropriate for a determination on the issue of inevitable discovery. See United States v. Casper, 332 Fed.Appx. 222, 223 (5th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Runyan, 275 F.3d 449, 466-67 (5th Cir.2001).
REMANDED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 F. App'x 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clinton-wade-dunson-ca5-2009.