United States v. Clifford Schuett
This text of 415 F. App'x 792 (United States v. Clifford Schuett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Clifford James Schuett appeals from the 42-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for threatening to kill or cause damage by explosive, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Schuett contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable given his criminal history and his motivation for committing the offense. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), particularly the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the crime and to protect the public, the district court’s sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United *793 States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993-94 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 F. App'x 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clifford-schuett-ca9-2011.