United States v. Clifford Schuett

415 F. App'x 792
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2011
Docket10-10243
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 415 F. App'x 792 (United States v. Clifford Schuett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Clifford Schuett, 415 F. App'x 792 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Clifford James Schuett appeals from the 42-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for threatening to kill or cause damage by explosive, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Schuett contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable given his criminal history and his motivation for committing the offense. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), particularly the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the crime and to protect the public, the district court’s sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United *793 States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993-94 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schuett v. United States
180 L. Ed. 2d 900 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 F. App'x 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clifford-schuett-ca9-2011.