United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey
846 F.2d 707, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701, 1988 WL 49838
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 8, 1988·No. 87-7651·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[1,2] The robbery of a bankteller at gunpoint is an act of “force and violence” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 2113(a). The evidence in this case is sufficient to support defendant’s convictions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(a) and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(d).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey, 846 F.2d 707, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701, 1988 WL 49838 (11th Cir. 1988).
846 F.2d 707 (United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Brian Jerome Lindsey
490 F. App'x 322 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)