United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey
846 F.2d 707, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701, 1988 WL 49838
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 1988
Docket87-7651
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 846 F.2d 707 (United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey, 846 F.2d 707, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701, 1988 WL 49838 (11th Cir. 1988).
Opinion
[1,2] The robbery of a bankteller at gunpoint is an act of “force and violence” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 2113(a). The evidence in this case is sufficient to support defendant’s convictions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(a) and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(d).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Brian Jerome Lindsey
490 F. App'x 322 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
846 F.2d 707, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701, 1988 WL 49838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cleveland-ohio-dailey-ca11-1988.