United States v. Cleveland Browns, Inc.

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

United States v. Cleveland Browns, Inc.

505 F.2d 1301

CourtTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 1974

DocketNo. 6-7

StatusPublished

This text of 505 F.2d 1301 (United States v. Cleveland Browns, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cleveland Browns, Inc., 505 F.2d 1301 (tecoa 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE UNDER RULE 28

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Motion to Affirm and brief in support thereof and Appellant’s Answer,

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the authority of Oakland Raiders v. Office of Emergency Preparedness, No. 9-11 (T.E.C.A., July 10, 1974); DeRieux v. The Five Smiths, Inc., 499 F.2d 1321 (Em.App.1974) and University of Southern California v. C.O.L.C., Em.App.1972, 472 F.2d 1065, cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928, 93 S.Ct. 1364, 35 L.Ed.2d 590.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE UNDER RULE 28

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Motion to Affirm and brief in support thereof and Appellant’s Answer,

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the authority of Oakland Raiders v. Office of Emergency Preparedness, No. 9-11 (T.E.C.A., July 10, 1974); DeRieux v. The Five Smiths, Inc., 499 F.2d 1321 (Em.App.1974) and University of Southern California v. C.O.L.C., Em.App.1972, 472 F.2d 1065, cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928, 93 S.Ct. 1364, 35 L.Ed.2d 590.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 F.2d 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cleveland-browns-inc-tecoa-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack