United States v. Cleshay L. Johnson
This text of United States v. Cleshay L. Johnson (United States v. Cleshay L. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 98-1891 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Cleshay L. Johnson, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Clee, * * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: April 1, 1999 Filed: April 9, 1999 ___________
Before FAGG, HEANEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Cleshay L. Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and now appeals from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district court. Johnson's counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), contending that Johnson's prison sentence is longer than necessary to achieve rehabilitation, retribution, or deterrence. We reject counsel's argument. Cf. United States v. Hutchinson, 926 F.2d 746, 747 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (defendant's request for sentence at low end of Guidelines range is unreviewable. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus affirm Johnson's sentence.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cleshay L. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cleshay-l-johnson-ca8-1999.