United States v. Cleona Hooper

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Cleona Hooper

438 F.2d 968, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8353

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 2, 1970

Docket20205_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 438 F.2d 968 (United States v. Cleona Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cleona Hooper, 438 F.2d 968, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8353 (6th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Following a jury trial the defendant-appellant appeals from his conviction of violating the Internal Revenue Laws Title 26 U.S.C. §§ 5686[a] and 5601 [a] [12]). He contends the laws upon which the indictment was based are unconstitutional, but this was decided adversely to his contention in United States v. Whitehead, 424 F.2d 446 (6th Cir. 1970). His other contention that a search warrant was improperly executed is also without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Following a jury trial the defendant-appellant appeals from his conviction of violating the Internal Revenue Laws Title 26 U.S.C. §§ 5686[a] and 5601 [a] [12]). He contends the laws upon which the indictment was based are unconstitutional, but this was decided adversely to his contention in United States v. Whitehead, 424 F.2d 446 (6th Cir. 1970). His other contention that a search warrant was improperly executed is also without merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 F.2d 968, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cleona-hooper-ca6-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack