United States v. Clemones

582 F.2d 1373
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 6, 1978·No. Nos. 76-3866, 76-3870·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The opinion is modified by deleting the following language (p. 1255):

Once the existence of a conspiracy is shown only slight evidence is required to warrant submitting to the jury the question of a particular defendant’s membership. See, e. g., U. S. v. Baldarrama, 566 F.2d 560, 566 (CA5, 1978).

The petitions for rehearing filed by Edward Raymond LeCompte, William Alonzo Johnson, Jr., Joseph Harold Johnson, Priscilla Scott and Mike. Clemones are DENIED, and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

The petition for panel rehearing filed by Kathy Hatmaker is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clemones, 582 F.2d 1373 (5th Cir. 1978).

582 F.2d 1373 (United States v. Clemones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related