United States v. Clements

462 F. App'x 639
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 2, 2012·No. No. 11-2541·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Marvin Clements was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), and sentenced to a term of 48 months’ imprisonment. After his release, Clements was arrested again for violating the terms of his supervision. The district court found that Clements was in violation of his supervision, revoked his supervised release, and sentenced him to a term of nine months’ imprisonment without any further supervised release. Clements filed a notice of appeal, and his appointed lawyer asserts that this appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Clements did not accept our invitation to address counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b).

Bureau of Prisons records show that Clements was released on February 15, 2012. Because Clements has already completed his sentence and faces no collateral consequences of the revocation of supervised release, this appeal can no longer provide him any relief. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, [640] 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280, 283-85 (4th Cir.2008); United States v. Mazzillo, 373 F.3d 181, 182 (1st Cir.2004). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clements, 462 F. App'x 639 (7th Cir. 2012).

462 F. App'x 639 (United States v. Clements) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Mazzillo
373 F.3d 181 (First Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Hardy
545 F.3d 280 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)