United States v. Clay Kirkland

479 F. App'x 650
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2012
Docket11-11159
StatusUnpublished

This text of 479 F. App'x 650 (United States v. Clay Kirkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Clay Kirkland, 479 F. App'x 650 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Clay Jarrad Kirkland appeals the within-guidelines 235-month sentence and the *651 consecutive 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime. Kirkland argues that the sentences are cruel and unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment because they are grossly disproportionate to the severity of the offenses committed.

Because Kirkland failed to object on this ground in the district court, review is for plain error. See United States v. Howard, 220 F.3d 645, 647 (5th Cir.2000). In comparison to the life sentence imposed in Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263, 100 S.Ct. 1133, 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980), on a nonviolent criminal pursuant to a recidivist statute, and the 30-year sentence imposed in United States v. Gonzales, 121 F.3d 928, 943-44 (5th Cir.1997), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O’Brien, — U.S. —, —, 130 S.Ct. 2169, 2180, 176 L.Ed.2d 979 (2010), on a non-habitual offender convicted of using or carrying a firearm during a drug-trafficking offense, the within-guidelines sentences imposed on Kirkland are not grossly disproportionate to his offenses. See Gonzales, 121 F.3d at 943; McGruder v. Puckett, 954 F.2d 313, 316 (5th Cir.1992).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gonzales
121 F.3d 928 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Rummel v. Estelle
445 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1980)
United States v. O’Brien
560 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Robert McGruder v. Steven W. Puckett
954 F.2d 313 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Jennifer Turner Howard
220 F.3d 645 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clay-kirkland-ca5-2012.