United States v. Clary
This text of 276 F. App'x 662 (United States v. Clary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Robert Clary appeals from the 64-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in [663]*663possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and for making a false statement in connection with the acquisition of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Clary contends that the district court presumed that a sentence within the Guidelines range was appropriate in violation of Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2465,168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). This contention is belied by the record.
Clary also contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court’s discussion of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors was inadequate. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err. See id. at 2469; see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995-97 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 F. App'x 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clary-ca9-2008.