United States v. Clark

25 F. Cas. 452, 2 Sprague 55

Opinion

SPRAGUE. District Judge,

in charging the jury, among other things instructed them as follows: That if the prisoner procured Hayden to enlist believing at the time that he would probably desert, still if the prisoner did not say or do any thing which would be likely to cause him to desert, or if what was said and done by the prisoner did not in fact cause Hayden to desert, then the prisoner is not guilty of the offence charged: but that it was not necessary, in order to establish the guilt of the prisoner, that the government should satisfy the jury that he wished or actually intended that Hayden should desert. It may be that his wishes and purposes went no further than to cause Hayden to enlist, and thereby to obtain for himself the reward for furnishing a recruit, and a part or the whole of the bounty money. It may be that he would have really preferred that Hayden should not be able to escape from the service. Still, if in order to induce Hayden to enlist to accomplish his own purpose of gain, the prisoner made representations and gave assurances to Hayden as to the means and facilities of deserting, and, after Hayden had enlisted, received from him his bounty money, and at the time when such representations were made, assurances given, and bounty money received, the prisoner believed that they would be likely to cause Hayden to desert, and they did cause him to desert, then the prisoner may be deemed to have procured or enticed him to desert within the meaning of the statute.

Verdict. “Guilty.”