United States v. Clark

25 F. Cas. 441, 4 D.C. 506, 4 Cranch 506

This text of 25 F. Cas. 441 (United States v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Clark, 25 F. Cas. 441, 4 D.C. 506, 4 Cranch 506 (circtddc 1835).

Opinion

CRanch, C. J.

Upon comparing this indictment with the form of an indictment for a similar offence in 2 Chitty’s Cr. Law, 244, the Court is of opinion that it is in substance a good indictment, and is sufficiently certain to require the defendant to plead to it.

The motion to quash it is, therefore, overruled. The other indictment against the same defendant for taking insufficient security in the case of Henry Miller, is even more full and formal than the other ; and the motion to quash it is also overruled. Thrus-ton, J., not sitting, as he was not present at the argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Cas. 441, 4 D.C. 506, 4 Cranch 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clark-circtddc-1835.