United States v. Clark

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 F. App'x 453
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2005·No. 04-50483·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 11, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50483 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENT L. CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-2064-1-KC --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Kent L. Clark has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of

the brief, Clark’s response, and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clark, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Clark (United States v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)