United States v. Clarence Hawkins, No. 73-3918 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New Yrok, 5th Cir. 19708 431 F.2d 409, Part I

492 F.2d 771
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 1974
Docket771
StatusPublished

This text of 492 F.2d 771 (United States v. Clarence Hawkins, No. 73-3918 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New Yrok, 5th Cir. 19708 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Clarence Hawkins, No. 73-3918 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New Yrok, 5th Cir. 19708 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 492 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

492 F.2d 771

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Clarence HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-3918 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New Yrok et al., 5th Cir. 19708 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 12, 1974.

William D. Soffar, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Frank McCown, U.S. Atty., W. E. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ft. Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court's order denying appellant Hawkins credit on his previously imposed sentence for time he spent on probation under the sentence is affirmed. See Baber v. United States, 368 F.2d 463, 465 (5th Cir. 1966); United States v. Guzzi, 275 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1960); Kaplan v. Hecht, 24 F.2d 664, 665 (2d Cir. 1928).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. George Charles Guzzi
275 F.2d 725 (Third Circuit, 1960)
Sanford R. Baber v. United States
368 F.2d 463 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
Kaplan v. Hecht
24 F.2d 664 (Second Circuit, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 F.2d 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clarence-hawkins-no-73-3918-summary-calendar-rule-18-ca5-1974.