United States v. Claiborne
781 F.2d 1334
Opinion
dissenting from the order denying hearing en banc:
Judges Ferguson and Reinhardt in their dissents raise a number of serious questions calling for en banc consideration. I voted to grant the en banc petition and feel constrained to dissent from our court’s refusal to do so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Claiborne, 781 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1986).
781 F.2d 1334 (United States v. Claiborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. Koch Industries, Inc.
89 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (D. Arizona, 2000)
State Bar of Nevada v. Claiborne
756 P.2d 464 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1988)