United States v. City of Springfield, City of Springfield v. United States
This text of 294 F.2d 958 (United States v. City of Springfield, City of Springfield v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
294 F.2d 958
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Defendant, Appellee.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Defendant, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee.
Nos. 5839, 5840.
United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.
Oct. 20, 1961.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusette; Francis J. W. Ford, Judge.
Robert S. Griswold, Jr., Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Remsey Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., W. Arthur Garrity, Jr., U.S. Atty., Harold Lavien, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., and Roger P. Marquis, Attorney, Department of Justice Washington, D.C., were on brief, for United States of America.
S. Thomas Martinelli, City Sol., Springfield, Mass., with whom John J. O'Connor, Associate City Sol., Springfield, Mass., was on brief, for City of Springfield.
Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have nothing to add to Judge Ford's opinion reported D.C.D.Mass.1961, 190 F.Supp. 817.
Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
294 F.2d 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-city-of-springfield-city-of-springfield-v-united-states-ca1-1961.