United States v. City of Parma, Ohio
669 F.2d 1100, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15341
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1981·No. 81-3031·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinions
ORDER
Less than a majority of the judges in active service having favored consideration en banc of the petition for rehearing, 661 F.2d 562 (6th Cir.), filed herein by the defendant-appellant, the petition has been referred to the hearing panel for disposition. Upon consideration the court concludes that all issues raised in the petition for rehearing were considered and decided by the court upon the original submission and that rehearing is not required.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. City of Parma, Ohio, 669 F.2d 1100, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15341 (6th Cir. 1981).
669 F.2d 1100 (United States v. City of Parma, Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Urban League of Greater New Brunswick v. TP. COMMITTEE OF CRANBURY
536 A.2d 287 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Arthur v. City of Toledo, Ohio
782 F.2d 565 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Arthur v. City of Toledo
782 F.2d 565 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Josie Jaimes v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority
758 F.2d 1086 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Jaimes v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority
758 F.2d 1086 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel
456 A.2d 390 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
United States v. City of Parma, Ohio
669 F.2d 1100 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)