United States v. Cisneros-Ramirez
This text of 329 F. App'x 735 (United States v. Cisneros-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Arturo Cisneros-Ramirez appeals from the 240-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams and more of methamphetamine and for laundering monetary instruments, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Cisneros-Ramirez contends his sentence is unreasonable because the district court improperly weighed some of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The district court did not procedurally err and the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 990-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cisneros-ramirez-ca9-2009.