United States v. Cisneros

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
Docket08-50789
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Cisneros (United States v. Cisneros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cisneros, (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 21, 2009 No. 08-50789 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK ALLEN CISNEROS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-156-1

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Mark Allen Cisneros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cisneros has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cisneros’ response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-50789

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Cisneros, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cisneros-ca5-2009.