United States v. Cisneros
This text of United States v. Cisneros (United States v. Cisneros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED October 21, 2009 No. 08-50789 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARK ALLEN CISNEROS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-156-1
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Mark Allen Cisneros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cisneros has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cisneros’ response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-50789
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cisneros, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cisneros-ca5-2009.