United States v. Cisneros

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Cisneros

206 F.3d 448, 2000 WL 263373

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 2000

Docket98-40955

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 206 F.3d 448 (United States v. Cisneros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cisneros, 206 F.3d 448, 2000 WL 263373 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the judges in active service having determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40568, United States of America vs. Betty Louise Marek. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the judges in active service having determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40568, United States of America vs. Betty Louise Marek. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 F.3d 448, 2000 WL 263373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cisneros-ca5-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack