United States v. Cinergy Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cinergy Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 458 F.3d 705
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided September 11, 2006·No. 06-1224·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 11, 2006

Before

Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge

Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge

Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge

No. 06-1224

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. and, No. 1:99-CV-01693 STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, Larry J. McKinney, Chief Judge.

v.

CINERGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

ORDER

Cinergy Corporation’s motion to correct alleged errors in the opinion in this case issued on August 17, 2006, is granted in part and denied in part. The following changes are made in the slip opinion:

P. 2, line 6: For “The modifications” substitute: “The EPA contends that the modifications”.

Same page, second line after first paragraph break: For “modifications” substitute: “a permit for modifications”. SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cinergy Corporation, (7th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Cinergy Corporation (United States v. Cinergy Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.