United States v. Chuck Collington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chuck Collington. Read the opinion of the Court — 995 F.3d 347
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2021·No. 7198-21·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHUCK PARKER COLLINGTON, a/k/a Chuck Berry Collington,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00342-RBH-1)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chuck Parker Collington, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chuck Parker Collington appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a

sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-

391, 132 Stat. 5194. On appeal, Collington disputes the court’s decision not to grant an

even greater reduction. However, we have reviewed the record and discern no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We deny Collington’s motion to

appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chuck Collington, (4th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Chuck Collington (United States v. Chuck Collington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.