United States v. Christy
This text of United States v. Christy (United States v. Christy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6975
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CARL ROBERT CHRISTY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-9)
Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: January 5, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Robert Christy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Carl Robert Christy appeals the district court’s order
denying his former Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. See United States v. Christy, No. CR-
89-9 (E.D.N.C. filed May 23, 2005 & entered May 24, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Christy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christy-ca4-2006.