United States v. Christopher Taylor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6416
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER JERMAINE TAYLOR, a/k/a Phoenix, a/k/a C-Murda.
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:15-cr-00009-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Jermaine Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher Jermaine Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying Taylor’s 18
U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. After reviewing
the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Taylor’s motion. See United States v. Trimble, 969 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 2020) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Christopher Taylor (United States v. Christopher Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.