United States v. Christopher Robertson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Christopher Robertson. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 F.4th 855
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 16, 2025·No. 24-7111·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-7111 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-7111

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ROBERTSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. David J. Novak, District Judge. (4:18-cr-00027-DJN-LRL-1)

Submitted: May 13, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025

Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Robertson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-7111 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Robertson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Stay

Hold in Abeyance or Otherwise Preserve the One-Year Statute-of Limitations under 28

U.S.C. § 2255(f).” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Robertson, No. 4:18-cr-00027-DJN-

LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Christopher Robertson, (4th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Christopher Robertson (United States v. Christopher Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related