United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin

88 F.3d 831, 96 Daily Journal DAR 8340, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5163, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16687
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 11, 1996·No. 93-50031·Published

Opinion

88 F.3d 831

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant,
and
Robert Rozelle; Aaron Hampton; Freddie Mack; Shelton
Auntwan Martin, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 93-50031, 93-50057.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 11, 1996.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Prior report: --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1480, 134 L.Ed.2d 687.

Before BROWNING, WALLACE, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, REINHARDT, LEAVY, RYMER, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case is remanded to the district court of proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin, 88 F.3d 831, 96 Daily Journal DAR 8340, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5163, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16687 (9th Cir. 1996).

88 F.3d 831 (United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Armstrong
517 U.S. 456 (Supreme Court, 1996)