United States v. Christopher J. Taylor
This text of 315 F.2d 630 (United States v. Christopher J. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
315 F.2d 630
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Christopher J. TAYLOR, Appellant.
No. 324.
Docket 28089.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 16, 1963.
Decided April 16, 1963.
Archibald A. Patterson, New York City, for appellant.
James M. Brachman, Asst. U. S. Atty., So. District of New York (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., and Arnold N. Enker, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed in open court. The sole question on appeal is the adequacy of the charge on wilfulness, which we hold sufficient. Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492, 497, 498, 63 S.Ct. 364, 87 L.Ed. 418 (1943).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 F.2d 630, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christopher-j-taylor-ca2-1963.