United States v. Christopher Egenberger

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: July 21, 2025
• Docket: 25-1113
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-1113 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Christopher John Egenberger

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: July 16, 2025 Filed: July 21, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Egenberger appeals after the district court1 revoked Egenberger’s supervised release and imposed a sentence of 24 months in prison followed by 48

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. months of supervised release. Egenberger’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.

After reviewing the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Egenberger. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). There is no indication the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (reciting factors to discern whether revocation sentence is unreasonable).

Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm the judgment. ______________________________

-2-