United States v. Christopher Christian, A/K/A James T. Gray

846 F.2d 74, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5608, 1988 WL 41127
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1988
Docket87-7393
StatusUnpublished

This text of 846 F.2d 74 (United States v. Christopher Christian, A/K/A James T. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Christopher Christian, A/K/A James T. Gray, 846 F.2d 74, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5608, 1988 WL 41127 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

846 F.2d 74
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Christopher CHRISTIAN, a/k/a James T. Gray, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-7393.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 1988.
Decided April 28, 1988.

Christopher Christian, appellant pro se.

Robert William Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL, and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Christian, a/k/a James T. Gray, currently incarcerated in Virginia upon a ten year state sentence for burglary, appeals the district court's denial of a motion to have his four year federal sentence, imposed upon conviction for dealing in firearms without a license (18 U.S.C. Secs. 922(a)(1) & 924) and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (18 U.S.C. Secs. 922(h)(1) & 924), run concurrently with the subsequently imposed state sentence. We affirm.

The district court had no authority to order that the federal sentence run concurrently with the state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. Secs. 4082, 3568; Cobb v. United States, 583 F.2d 695 (4th Cir.1978); Ange v. Paderick, 521 F.2d 1066 (4th Cir.1975). Therefore, the district court properly denied the motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue has recently been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loyd Jasper Ange, Jr. v. E. L. Paderick
521 F.2d 1066 (Fourth Circuit, 1975)
Eddie Lee Cobb, Jr. v. United States
583 F.2d 695 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Swinney (Lyndon C.) v. Barna (David S.)
846 F.2d 74 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 F.2d 74, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5608, 1988 WL 41127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christopher-christian-aka-james-t-gray-ca4-1988.