United States v. Christopher Bernard Williams

231 F. App'x 936
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 16, 2007
Docket07-11432
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 F. App'x 936 (United States v. Christopher Bernard Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Christopher Bernard Williams, 231 F. App'x 936 (11th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for Christopher Williams, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Christopher Bernard Williams
25 F.4th 1307 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 F. App'x 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christopher-bernard-williams-ca11-2007.