United States v. Christine Lark

577 F.2d 105
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 1978·No. 77-3321·Published

Opinion

577 F.2d 105

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Christine LARK, Appellant.

No. 77-3321.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 16, 1978.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing July 20, 1978.

Claudia A. Wilken, Asst. Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Mark L. Webb, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge.*

Appellant failed to object or except to the giving of the Allen instruction. Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896). Our examination of the record convinces us that appellant is in no position to raise the question at this time. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Apellant's other contentions: (1) that the judge abused his discretion in failing to interrogate the potential jurors in accordance with her requests, (2) that the government failed to comply with the discovery requirements of Rule 16, F.R.Crim.P., and (3) that the government's failure to disclose to her that it intended to use her statement, in which she disclosed that she knew the combination to her codefendant's suitcase was error, are meritless.

*

The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Christine Lark, 577 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1978).

577 F.2d 105 (United States v. Christine Lark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. United States
164 U.S. 492 (Supreme Court, 1896)
United States v. Lark
577 F.2d 105 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)