United States v. Christiansen
This text of 356 F.2d 986 (United States v. Christiansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
356 F.2d 986
UNITED STATES of America and Wellesley R. Slifer, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service
v.
Christian CHRISTIANSEN, Christy Corporation, Millville Corporation and King & Prince, Inc.
Christian Christiansen, Appellant.
No. 15715.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued February 25, 1966.
Decided March 16, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Thomas F. Meaney, Judge.
Herbert L. Zuckerman, Newark, N. J., for appellant.
Burton Berkley, U. S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D. C. (C. Moxley Featherston, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph M. Howard, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Kenneth P. Zauber, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellees.
Before HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order requiring the sole shareholder of a corporation to comply with demands of the Internal Revenue Service that he produce certain corporate books and records. The sole question is whether the order violates the shareholder's privilege against self-incrimination. We have recently examined this contention and rejected it in an essentially like case. Wright v. Detwiler, 3 Cir. 1965, 345 F.2d 1012.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F.2d 986, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 617, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christiansen-ca3-1966.