United States v. Chow
This text of 84 F. App'x 911 (United States v. Chow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Lawrence T.G. Chow appeals the judgment imposing an 18-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of a firearm by an unlawful user of a controlled substance, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines, and for clear error its factual findings at sentencing. See United States v. Seesing, 234 F.3d 456, 459 (9th Cir.2000).
Petitioner contends that the district court clearly erred in applying a four level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) for possession of a firearm in connection with his unlawful use of or addiction to a controlled substance. Specifically, he argues that there is no evidence connecting the firearm to the drug offense, and that the firearm did not embolden him to sell marijuana. This contention lacks merit. The record supports a reasonable inference that possession of the firearm emboldened Chow’s felonious activity since the firearm, which could be used to compel payment or defend drugs, was readily accessible from his bedroom closet. See United States v. Polanco, 93 F.3d 555, 567 [912]*912(9th Cir.1996) (holding that the presence of a firearm in defendant’s nearby car was sufficient to support finding that the possession of the firearm emboldened defendant while selling drugs).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chow-ca9-2003.