United States v. Chok Chai Chow
This text of 81 F. App'x 226 (United States v. Chok Chai Chow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Chok Chai Chow appeals the 18-month sentence imposed upon the district court’s revocation of his supervised release term. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
We enforce Chow’s appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal because Chow’s 18-[227]*227month sentence is below the 24-month maximum sentence agreed upon by the parties, and because Chow does not contend that his waiver was unknowing or involuntary. United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissing an appeal because a defendant signed an unambiguous waiver of appeal, and because he waived the issue of whether it was knowing or voluntary by failing to raise the issue on appeal).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chok-chai-chow-ca9-2003.