United States v. Chisum
76 M.J. 264, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 304
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 14, 2017·No. No. 17-0199/AF·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
CCA S32311. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:.
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE’S FAILURE TO CONDUCT AN IN CAMERA REVIEW OF AND FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS OF AB AK AND AB CR DEPRIVED APPELLANT OF HIS RIGHT TO CONFRONT THE SOLE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM IN VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION. •
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Chisum, 76 M.J. 264, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 304 (Ark. 2017).
76 M.J. 264 (United States v. Chisum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Morales
Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2017