United States v. Chisolm

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Chisolm

45 F. App'x 268

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 5, 2002

DocketNo. 02-6447

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Chisolm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Chisolm, 45 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Henry Wesley Chisolm appeals the district court’s order denying his motion styled as one to Correct a Plain Error Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Chisolm, No. CR-98-1186 (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Henry Wesley Chisolm appeals the district court’s order denying his motion styled as one to Correct a Plain Error Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Chisolm, No. CR-98-1186 (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chisolm-ca4-2002.