United States v. Chisholm

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Chisholm

19 C.M.A. 352, 19 USCMA 352, 41 C.M.R. 352, 1970 CMA LEXIS 915, 1970 WL 7351

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 1970

DocketNo. 22,757

StatusPublished

This text of 19 C.M.A. 352 (United States v. Chisholm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Chisholm, 19 C.M.A. 352, 19 USCMA 352, 41 C.M.R. 352, 1970 CMA LEXIS 915, 1970 WL 7351 (cma 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

This is another ease involving consideration of paragraph 38a, Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Directive 37-6. In United States v Benway, 19 USCMA 345, 41 CMR 345 (1970), this Court determined that the directive could be punitively applied. The directive, therefore, will support Chisholm’s conviction under specifications 1 and 2 of Charge II of purchasing money orders in excess of the maximum monthly amount.

The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI