United States v. Chin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 1999·No. 99-6002·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY CHIN, a/k/a Dallas,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-361-A, CA-98-1442-AM)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin David Miller, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Chin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) and motion filed

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis-

miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Chin, Nos. CR-94-361-A; CA-98-1442-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 9,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chin, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Chin (United States v. Chin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related