United States v. Chin
This text of United States v. Chin (United States v. Chin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY CHIN, a/k/a Dallas,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-361-A, CA-98-1442-AM)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin David Miller, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Larry Chin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) and motion filed
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis-
miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Chin, Nos. CR-94-361-A; CA-98-1442-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 9,
1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Chin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chin-ca4-1999.